Sunday - somewhat soggy

Mutterings continued

Drizzle on and off, clear skies, more rain, dunno what it wants to do.

Watched a very dire film last night that could only be improved by Crow, Tom Servo, Mike et al. Prince of Space is an appalling Japanese production. An altogether different, and wonderful, Japanese offering is The Cat Returns, from Studio Ghibli. Lovely stuff.

More amusements from the Inbox. I doubt if this is true but it makes amusing reading:

The story behind the letter below is that there is this fellow in Newport,
Rhode Island, named Scott Williams who digs things out of his backyard and
sends the stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, Washington DC, labeling them
with scientific names, insisting that they are actual archaeological finds. This guy
really exists and does this in his spare time! Anyway here's the actual response from the Smithsonian Institution. Bear this in mind next time you think you are challenged in your duty to respond to a difficult situation in writing.

________________________
>
>Smithsonian Institute
>207 Pennsylvania Avenue
>Washington, DC 20078
>
>Dear Mr. Williams:
>Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "93211-D,
>layer seven, next to the clothesline post...Hominid skull."
>
>We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret
>to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents
>conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago.
>
>Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll,
>of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, believes to
>be "Malibu Barbie."
>
>It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis
>of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are
>familiar with your prior work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with
>your findings. However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:

>
>1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically
>fossilized bone.
>
>2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic
>centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified
>proto-homonids.
>
>3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the
>common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene
>clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time.
>
>This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you
>have submitted in your history with this institution, but the evidence
>seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that:
>
>A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has
>chewed on.
>
>B. Clams don't have teeth.
>
>It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request
>to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to the heavy load
>our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly due to carbon-dating's
>notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were were produced prior to 1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results.

>
>Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National
>Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning your
>specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino. Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy, but was

>ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin.

>
>However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating
>specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it
>is, nonetheless,yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to
>accumulate here so effortlessly.
>
>You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own
>office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to
>the Institution, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your Newport back yard.

>
>We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed
>in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for
>it. We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding
>the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a structural matrix that
>makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex femur you recently discovered take on
>the deceptive appearance of rusty 9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench.

Of course clams don't have teeth; clams got legs!